TU NO ESTAS SOLO EN ESTE MUNDO. YOU ARE NOT ALONE SI TE HA GUSTADO UN ARTICULO, COMPARTELO

Monday, August 14, 2006

FROM CHILEAN PRESIDENCY

Head of State led regional Cabinet meeting PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 11 August 2006

ImageThe President of the Republic, Michelle Bachelet, led a Regional Cabinet meeting in La Serena which corresponds to the continuation of the Government’s work with local authorities – as has occurred in Iquique, Antofagasta & Talca – to define the area and regional posture regarding the roadmap provided on May 21, and the regional plan.

In this opportunity, several issues were discussed such as the development of agriculture, tourism, fishing and the boost of small and medium sized regional industries, among others. "This is a region that has very active public and private sectors, where there are universities, where it is possible to work with a consortium framework and look at how to develop mega-projects, as how clusters are developed, productive chains that allow these vocations to become a reality such as tourism, fishing, culture or entrepreneurship, thus improving the life of every one of its inhabitants of the IV Region".

Regarding infrastructure, the President confirmed the construction of El Bato dam as well as Aguas Negras [Black Waters] pass, both initiatives being very important from an agricultural point of view and the integration with Argentina. Concerning health, she also announced the study of the possibility of improving the assistance networks in the cities of La Serena, Coquimbo and Ovalle together with the primary care of smaller locations.

As far as tourism is concerned, she valued the commitment taken by the regional authorities to increase the number of tourists who currently arrive at the region, from 620 thousand to 1 million in the year 2010. "This is an extremely important goal, as tourism is an economic activity that generates resources and employment", she added.

Regional agenda

Following the meeting with the local authorities, the President went to Vicuña, where she participated in the delivery of watering bonds, in the Puclaro reservoir area.

This project, located 40 kilometers from La Serena, started being built in 1996 and allows watering about 20.700 hectares, palliating the drought effects affecting the Elqui valley. This year the administration was transferred to the Junta de Vigilancia [Vigilance Assembly] of the River and its tributaries.

Twenty one watering bonds were handed out during the activity, in representation of the various canalista [water channel users] associations and area communities, benefiting 2.495 farmers belonging to the provinces of Elqui, Limarí & Choapa.

The President will perform an inspection visit to the remodeling works at San Juan de Dios Hospital in La Serena in the afternoon. The total investment is around 1.700 million pesos and includes the complete change of the roof of the clinic services, tap water pipe repairs, and sewage as well as the electric installations. This is being done thanks to the resources coming from the Programming Agreement between the Ministry of Health and the Regional Development Fund.

The works – which began in December of last year – will benefit an estimated population of about 150 thousand people. The end of the works is scheduled for the month of January, 2007.

Four vehicles will also be provided in this opportunity which form part of the vehicle exchange program for the region’s Hospitals and include ambulances and shuttles benefiting the Salamanca & Combarbalá Hospitals.

The entire project – 190 million pesos – in addition to the aforementioned vehicles, includes three basic ambulances for Combarbalá Hospital, one basic ambulance for Andacollo Hospital and one fully equipped ambulance for Illapel Hospital.

Source: www.presidency.cl

Saturday, August 12, 2006

PUTIN...

'Russia: Portraits of Putin'
by Veronica Khokhlova

Samson Sholademi - LJ user sholademi, journalist of a Russian tabloid Express Gazeta - displays a unique drawing collection on his blog: portraits of Russia's president Vladimir Putin, made by children (mainly).

There is Putin "relaxing at home, reading a book to his doggie Kony" (by Vika Lvova, 9), and there is Putin with Kony on a desert island (by Boris G., 11), and there is Putin "always brushing his teeth in the morning, and there's a toilet made of gold in his bathroom" (by Nastya Karpova, 9).

There is Putin driving around with George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice (by Dasha N., 12), and there is Putin next to the Kremlin Wall, with the Russian flag up and the U.S. flag down: "Russia - forever, America - pfooooo!" (by D. Petrenko, 11), and there is Putin's fist directed at a head with Hitler's mustache and a U.S. flag above it, with the words: "George is a very bad cowboy! V. V. Putin will protect us!" (by Roman Belov, 6-grader).

There is a Boris-Berezovsky-look-alike Putin, standing next to a boxing ring, wearing a suit instead of a kimono: the author - Alisa Lukshina, 7, daughter of LJ user agatangel, Kyiv, Ukraine - isn't sure what "kimono" is.

There is a fish with Putin's initials - VVP - sitting on a gas pipe (by an anonymous young man).

There is Putin with a Russian tricolor halo around his head (by LJ user zhivaya_voda).

There is much more.



For Sholademi, it began as a Russia Day assignment in early June (RUS):

I was given an interesting assignment at work today: to ask ordinary kindergarten and school kids (grades 1-6) to draw our president - Vladimir Vladimirovich. The way they imagine him when they hear the word "Putin."

I've already found a group of school and kindergarten kids for this "experiment." But to be honest, I don't want to limit myself to these two age groups only: from 3 to 6 and from 7 to 12 years old. And geographically, to Moscow alone.

It'd be interesting to see how Putin would be drawn by older people and those from other cities or even other countries.

That's why I want you, my friends and readers of my LJ, to take part in this competition of amateur drawings called "Kids Drawing Putin."

[...]

The following themes are welcome in your work:

1. Putin with his black labrador Kony.

2. Putin on a fighter jet.

3. Putin on a submarine.

4. Putin greets the launching of the rocket complex "Bulava."

5. Putin with the Patriarch Alexiy II.

6. Putin with wife and children.

7. Putin with Bush or any other foreign leader.

8. Putin as an intelligence officer.

9. Putin wearing a kimono robe.

10. Putin skiing.

11. Putin with Yeltsin.

12. Putin as a retired man.

Below is the translation (RUS) of what Sholademi wrote for his newspaper after the drawing session:

[...]

Some schoolkids, especially first- and second-graders - had a very vague idea of how Vladimir Vladimirovich looked in real life.

- How should we draw him, with the hair or hairless? - asked 9-year-old Misha.

Opinions differed. Some children thought that Putin does have something growing on his head: on the sides, at least. Others thought that the Russian president is bold.

A teacher wanted to clarify at some point, but I caught her just in time with a cautioning gesture. Let each child draw Putin's portrait independently, the way he imagines him, not relying on the adults' advice.

This is why girls drew VVP with hair - and sometimes even with a bit too much of it, while boys made Putin look older by leaving a few thin curles on his head.

Another issue of contention was the color of the president's eyes: blue or brown? The girls made his eyes the color of the sky; the boys worked hard on painting them black or brown.

[...]

The newspaper's competition of kids' drawings closes on October 7, Putin's birthday, with an exhibition at the State Duma. Winners will receive prizes; their work will be sent to Putin as birthday gifts.

Not surprisingly, prizes will be Putin-themed (RUS):

First place: A black labrador puppy - same as Putin's favorite dog Kony. To the winner's parents - a keg of German beer.

Second place: A Japanese kimono robe with black belt. To parents - also, a keg of German beer.

Third place: A German language audio course for beginners. And a keg of German beer for the parents.

You may view the latest post at
http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2006/08/11/russia-portraits-of-putin/

from legal watch

Legal Blog Watch
Lawyers and Pro Bono
Back when I was in law school, I always envisioned pro bono work as representing a client who couldn't afford a lawyer. Like the penniless elderly woman living in an uninhabitable apartment building facing eviction by an evil slumlord. The minimum-wage mom with three kids trying to get a divorce from an abusive spouse. A defendant accused of a capital crime who might be able to show he was wrongly accused if he could afford a lawyer and a decent team of experts rather than the lawyer assigned by the court to take the case for a capped fee of $3,000. Or the homeless men I used to represent here in D.C. when I started my legal career, who were trying to recover unemployment benefits or clean up their credit that was tarnished when they signed up for loans from a sham vocational program. 

So much for my innocent visions of pro bono; apparently, it's gone and grown up while I wasn't looking. As Linda Singer writes in this article,  Why Lawyers Should Take on Pro Bono, pro bono projects now encompass providing free work for banks to help them deal with Patriot Act concerns or evaluating the success of the No Child Left Behind Act or the effectiveness of state and local government efforts to help Hurricane Katrina victims back to self-sufficiency.

I know that all of these efforts help the public. Yet, should this all count as pro bono? Do lawyers really need incentive to work on projects where they interact with banks and government officials and, in the process, build their contacts and resumes? And while these programs are undoubtedly important, pro bono efforts devoted on these matters diverts attention from representing individuals whose matters don't make headlines, but who really do not have any other options.

What's your opinion? Should we encourage large firms to participate in large, "impact case" matters pro bono? And if we do, how do we address the problem of the individuals who need pro bono help?

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on August 11, 2006 at 02:16 PM | Permalink

Exposure of Recent Terrorism Plot: What Does It Prove About the Bush Administration's Policies?
nwide wiretaps or datamining bank records. It was uncovered by classic law enforcement techniques.

It's still too early to determine what actions contributed to the exposure of the liquid explosives plot. But expect the blogosphere to continue to debate these issues as the story unfolds.

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on August 11, 2006 at 02:13 PM | Permalink

Freebies for Summer: Reading and Taking It With You
A couple of Law.com's affiliate bloggers offered some summer freebies today: Bruce Macewen tips us off to a neat, free online book by Patrick McKenna, The First Hundred Days: Transitioning A New Managing Partner. And  Future Lawyer Rick Georges posts about Tom Mighell's recent article, Links for the Road Warrior, which tells lawyers, just in time for summer vacation, how they can keep in close touch w ith the home office even while they're on the road. 

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on August 11, 2006 at 02:06 PM | Permalink

Sponsor Spotlight

Free In-House Counsel Webcast
Learn how IP experts are addressing the growing threat of online brand abuse by attending this FREE webcast: Preventing Online Brand Abuse. This one-hour presentation will surface the latest trends and best practices in establishing, maintaining and protecting corporate brands on the Internet. This on-demand event includes panelists from Best Western, TaylorMade and Verizon. View Now!

Inside Opinions: Legal Blogs
Robert Ambrogi's LawSites
Blawg Review
Adam Smith, Esq.
I/P Updates
Silicon Valley Media Blog
InhouseBlog
My Shingle
Prism Legal
Human Law
May It Please The Court
Leadership for Lawyers
Law Department Management
Insurance Scrawl
Crime & Federalism
The Wired GC
The Common Scold
Jottings by an Employer's Lawyer
Future Lawyer
Professional Services Marketing Blog
From the Law.com Newswire
[about RSS]
Law.com Privacy Policy


This Legal Blog Watch Alert is brought you by ALM's Law.com (http://www.law.com/service/aboutlaw.shtml).

To unsubscribe from the Legal Blog Watch Alert, go to http://store.law.com/registration/unsubscribe.asp?p=lbw&f=html .

Questions? Comments? Complaints? Send us an email at subscription@corp.law.com.

By using Law.com's Legal Blog Watch Alert, you are agreeing to abide by our Terms of Service at http://www.law.com/service/terms_conditions.html.

Copyright © 2005 ALM Properties, Inc. All rights reserved.

Friday, August 11, 2006

ANTE EL TERRORISMO MEDIDAS URGENTES PARA PASAJEROS.

El Reino Unido prohíbe llevar equipaje de mano en los aviones

El tráfico aéreo británico comienza a normalizarse | 10 de agosto de 2006

 

El tráfico aéreo en el Reino Unido vuelve poco a poco a la normalidad tras el caos vivido el jueves. El aeropuerto de Heathrow ya permite la llegada y salida de aviones, aunque las medidas de seguridad siguen siendo exhaustivas y los retrasos continuarán durante todo el viernes.

 

BAA, la empresa gestora del aeródromo, confirmó que la restricción se levantó el jueves a las 18:00 hora peninsular y "las aerolíneas están de nuevo operando vuelos de corta distancia (menos de tres horas de duración) hacia Heathrow".

 

A las 19:00 horas de el jueves, un total de 302 vuelos con destino al aeropuerto londinense se habían cancelado, mientras que el retraso medio de las llegadas era de una media hora.

 

A esa misma hora, un total de 309 vuelos que tenían previsto salir de Heathrow habían sido suspendidos, entre ellos todos los servicios de corta distancia que la aerolínea British Airways (BA) preveía operar durante la jornada.

 

Las compañías aéreas aconsejan a los pasajeros que confirmen sus vuelos por Internet De cara al viernes, BAA señala que aunque Heathrow estará abierto, será inevitable que algunos vuelos se cancelen. La compañía aeroportuaria añade que las medidas de seguridad introducidas en respuesta a la amenaza terrorista seguirán vigentes durante todo el día.

 

El resto de aeropuertos británicos opera con normalidad, aunque los registros de equipajes de mano están siendo exhaustivos y ello está provocando la demora de numerosos vuelos.

 

Cancelaciones en España

En nuestro país, hasta las 19:00 horas de el jueves los aeropuertos españoles habían operado 366 vuelos de un total de 787 programados con el Reino Unido, según datos de Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea (AENA), que aconseja a los viajeros que se informen de la situación de sus viajes.

 

Iberia canceló 13 vuelos entre España y la capital británica, más sus respectivos regresos: seis desde Madrid, tres desde Barcelona y uno desde Valencia, Sevilla, Bilbao y La Coruña. La compañía ha programado para hoy un Airbus A340-600 para volar la ruta Madrid-Londres en sustitución de un A320, lo que supondrá un incremento de 380 plazas.

 

Los pasajeros de Iberia que tengan un vuelo con origen, destino o tránsito en cualquier aeropuerto del Reino Unido pueden posponer el viaje sin penalización, o bien solicitar el reembolso del importe del billete.

Trama terrorista

 

El Reino Unido ha reforzado la seguridad en todos los aeropuertos británicos después del anuncio ayer de Scotland Yard del desmantelamiento de una trama terrorista. Un total de 24 personas han sido detenidas en el área de Londres como resultado de la operación policial.

 

Siguiendo instrucciones del Gobierno británico, los pasajeros no podrán llevar bolsos de mano a bordo de aviones que partan de cualquier aeropuerto del Reino Unido. Esta medida la aplicarán todas las compañías que operan en los aeropuertos británicos.

 

Los pasajeros sólo podrán llevar sus efectos personales, pasaportes y billeteras en bolsas de plástico transparentes. Cualquier viajero que se niegue a cumplir con las restricciones impuestas sobre equipaje no será autorizado a entrar en el avión.

 

Por este motivo, miles de viajeros se exponen este viernes a un segundo día de retrasos, cancelaciones de vuelos y angustiosas demoras. Pese a la insistencia de algunas compañías de que hoy retornaría poco a poco la normalidad en el cumplimiento de los horarios, algunos vuelos han sido cancelados y son de esperar fuertes retrasos en otros.

 

Las compañías aéreas aconsejan a sus pasajeros que consulten el estado de sus vuelos por Internet, se presenten con tiempo suficiente en el aeropuerto y no lleven equipaje de mano porque tendrán que entregarlo en el mostrador.

 

Los pasajeros sólo podrán llevar sus efectos personales en bolsas de plástico transparentes British Airways (BA) expresa en su página web su confianza en que saldrían "la inmensa mayoría" de los vuelos aunque aconseja a los potenciales viajeros que, antes de dirigirse al aeropuerto, consultasen su página en la Red .

 

"British Airways operará todos los vuelos de larga distancia desde Gatwick y desde Heathrow con excepción de algunos con dirección a Estados Unidos", reza el comunicado colgado en la red refiriéndose a los dos aeropuertos del área londinense. La compañía británica agrega que esperaba que operen normalmente todos los vuelos de corta distancia desde el aeropuerto de Gatwick con excepción de nueve que han sido cancelados. "Asimismo se confía en mantener aproximadamente un 60% de los vuelos de corta distancia así como los nacionales a partir de y con dirección al aeropuerto de London Heathrow", especifica BA, que reconoce al mismo tiempo que seguirán las perturbaciones.

 

Los vuelos entre el aeropuerto madrileño de Barajas y el londinense de Heatrhow operan hoy con normalidad. Por otra parte, Iberia recuerda que también las autoridades del de Estados Unidos han implantado restricciones en el equipaje de mano. En EE. UU., tanto los vuelos de salida como en los de llegada no está permitido transportar líquidos o geles en el equipaje de mano.

 

El operador de los principales aeropuertos británicos, BAA, recientemente adquirido por el grupo español Ferrovial, informaba a su vez de que se están produciendo "significativas perturbaciones en las operaciones debido al incremento de las medidas de seguridad" en Heathrow. "El aeropuerto está abierto y se espera que pueda recuperar prácticamente su normalidad, aun cuando respetando las nuevas restricciones, en los próximos días", añadía BBA.

 

Ayer jueves, el caos fue absoluto en los principales aeropuertos, pero sobre todo en el de Heathrow debido a la cancelación de más de 200 de los 550 vuelos que diariamente salen de este último. En vista del caos, varias compañías extranjeras como Iberia, Lufthansa, Air Lingus o Air France suspendieron ayer todos o parte de sus vuelos a la capital británica.

 

Mientras en Nueva York la preocupación y los nervios se hicieron más notorios de lo habitual ayer en los rostros de numerosos pasajeros que se disponían a abordar un vuelo trasatlántico desde el aeropuerto John F. Kennedy. Algunos viajeros no podían ocultar la inquietud, al coincidir su viaje con la noticia de la desarticulación de un complot para atentar contra aviones en ruta entre este país y el Reino Unido.

 

Retrasos y cancelaciones

El aeropuerto de Heathrow canceló todos los vuelos de llegada previstos hasta las 20:00 horas del jueves. Las autoridades aeroportuarias británicas pidieron a todas las aerolíneas que canceleran sus vuelos a Londres-Heathrow. Los de salida se mantuvieron, aunque con importantes retrasos.

El resto de aeropuertos británicos continuó operando, aunque los registros de equipajes de mano fueron exhaustivos, lo que provocó el retraso de numerosos vuelos.

En el aeropuerto de Manchester (norte de Inglaterra), los retrasos para despachar maletas fueron de unas tres horas, especialmente en los vuelos nacionales. Un portavoz de esa base aérea informó de que el personal aeroportuario entregó bolsas de plástico a la gente para que pudiera llevar sus artículos más necesarios, como pasaportes y billeteras.

 

En el aeropuerto de Stansted, al norte de Londres, una portavoz dijo que no había problemas importantes pero pidió a la gente que tuviera paciencia y que colaborara con las autoridades aeroportuarias.

 

El Centro Conjunto de Análisis de Terrorismo del Reino Unido elevó el jueves el nivel de amenaza de "severo" (probable) al "crítico". La amenaza de un "inminente" ataque terrorista provocó el caos en los aeropuertos británicos y numerosas cancelaciones de vuelos en Europa.

 

La compañía española Iberia, la alemana Lufthansa y la griega Olympic, entre otras, anunciaron la suspensión temporal de sus vuelos a Londres a raíz del descubrimiento en el Reino Unido de un supuesto complot para hacer estallar varios aviones en el aire. También la compañía Air Berlin canceló la mayoría de sus vuelos dentro y hacia el Reino Unido, dijo una portavoz.

 

Iberia se vió obligada a cancelar un total de nueve vuelos con destino a Londres.

 

Del total de vuelos cancelados, cuatro salían desde Madrid-Barajas, dos desde Barcelona-El Prat, uno desde Valencia, otro desde Bilbao y otro desde Sevilla, además de sus respectivos regresos.

 

Las salidas desde el aeropuerto de Heathrow también se vieron afectadas por fuertes demoras, que afectaron a los dos vuelos de Iberia que pudieron operar hasta aquel momento, uno con destino Madrid y otro Barcelona.

 

Los aeropuertos españoles operaron un total de 181 vuelos, el 56,9%, de los 318 que había programados el día 10 entre España y el Reino Unido hasta las 14:00 horas, según fuentes de AENA. El número total de operaciones programadas para todo el día entre aeropuertos españoles y el Reino Unido era de 787, de los que 56 eran hacia el Aeropuerto de Londres-Heathrow.

 

Más seguridad en EE.UU.

Los vuelos entre el aeropuerto madrileño de Barajas y el londinense de Heatrhow operan hoy con normalidad. Por otra parte, Iberia recuerda que también las autoridades del de Estados Unidos han implantado restricciones en el equipaje de mano. En EE. UU., tanto los vuelos de salida como en los de llegada no está permitido transportar líquidos o geles en el equipaje de mano.

 

Las compañías Continental, Delta, Northwest y United Airlines han hecho un llamamiento a sus pasajeros para que se presenten en el aeropuerto tres horas antes del horario de salida. Aunque las restricciones de momento no son tan estrictas como en el Reino Unido, los pasajeros procedentes de vuelos internacionales serán sometidos a fuertes inspecciones al llegar a territorio estadounidense, afirman las autoridades.

 

El operador de los principales aeropuertos británicos, BAA, recientemente adquirido por el grupo español Ferrovial, informaba a su vez de que se están produciendo "significativas perturbaciones en las operaciones debido al incremento de las medidas de seguridad" en Heathrow. "El aeropuerto está abierto y se espera que pueda recuperar prácticamente su normalidad, aun cuando respetando las nuevas restricciones, en los próximos días", añadía BBA.

 

Ayer jueves, el caos fue absoluto en los principales aeropuertos, pero sobre todo en el de Heathrow debido a la cancelación de más de 200 de los 550 vuelos que diariamente salen de este último. En vista del caos, varias compañías extranjeras como Iberia, Lufthansa, Air Lingus o Air France suspendieron ayer todos o parte de sus vuelos a la capital británica.

 

Mientras en Nueva York la preocupación y los nervios se hicieron más notorios de lo habitual ayer en los rostros de numerosos pasajeros que se disponían a abordar un vuelo trasatlántico desde el aeropuerto John F. Kennedy. Algunos viajeros no podían ocultar la inquietud, al coincidir su viaje con la noticia de la desarticulación de un complot para atentar contra aviones en ruta entre este país y el Reino Unido.

 

Recomendaciones

La aerolínea británica de bandera recomendaba ayer a los viajeros que se quedaran en casa si no tenían necesidad imperiosa de viajar y a aquellos que ya tuvieran adquirido el billete les ha ofrecido la posibilidad de devolverles el dinero o de cambiar la fecha del vuelo para antes del 1 de diciembre próximo.

 

AENA aconseja a todos los pasajeros que tengan previsto viajar al Reino Unido que confirmen con sus compañías la situación de sus vuelos.

 

El Ministerio de Exteriores advierte de que estas medidas están suponiendo considerables retrasos en el embarque de pasajeros y para el aeropuerto de Heathrow recomienda presentarse con antelación de 3 a 5 horas. Para más información los consumidores pueden visitar la web del Ministerio de Exteriores, donde se actualizará la información sobre las recomendaciones oficiales. También se puede llamar a estos números de teléfono: 91 379 97 00, 91 379 83 00 y 91 379 17 00, propios del departamento de Servicios Consulares.

 

Iberia comunicaba ayer a Consumer.es EROSKi mediante una nota de prensa que va a flexibilizar las condiciones de los billetes para facilitar los cambios y reembolsos a los clientes afectados. Así mismo informa a todos los pasajeros que viajen a terceros destinos, vía un aeropuerto del Reino Unido, de que deberán pasar el control de emigración en el primer aeropuerto de llegada, recoger su equipaje y volver a facturar.

 

La compañía British Airways habilitó en su sitio web una página con información actualizada sobre el estado de los vuelos.

 

La aerolínea de bajo coste easyJet canceló todos sus vuelos previstos para el jueves y hacía los tres aeropuertos de Londres en los que opera: Gatwick, Luton y Stansted. La compañía aconsejó a los pasajeros afectados por las cancelaciones que no se desplazaran hasta el aeropuerto y que entraran en la página web de la aerolínea, www.easyjet.com , para que se les devolviera el dinero de los billetes o la posibilidad de viajar en una fecha posterior sin coste alguno.

 

El teléfono de AENA para consultas de clientes es el 902 404 704. En su web hay un apartado para consultar en tiempo real información sobre los vuelos.

 

 Prohibiciones El Departamento de Transportes británico pidió hoy a todos los pasajeros aéreos que sean "pacientes y comprensivos" y que "cooperen plenamente con la policía y el personal de seguridad de los aeropuertos". Además, difundió una lista de los efectos personales básicos que los pasajeros podrán llevar consigo en sus viajes, "en una sola bolsa de plástico, a ser posible transparente", ya que los bolsos están prohibidos.

 

Las normas establecidas para acceder al embarque son:

 

1.        Los equipajes de mano deberán ser facturados y los pasajeros sólo podrán llevar consigo algunos efectos personales en una bolsa de plástico, y nada en los bolsillos.

2.        Sólo podrán llevar carteras y monederos pequeños con su contenido imprescindible (dinero, tarjetas de crédito, carnés de identidad) y los documentos de viaje esenciales (pasaporte y billetes).

3.        Los viajeros que lo precisen podrán llevar también consigo medicamentos y material médico en una cantidad suficiente y esencial para el vuelo (por ejemplo kits para personas diabéticas), pero no en estado líquido, "a menos que se verifique que es auténtico".

4.        Las gafas están permitidas, pero sin funda, y los envases de lentillas, pero no sus líquidos.

5.        Quienes viajen con niños pueden llevar alimentos infantiles y leches, pero su contenido deberá ser probado por el pasajero adulto que acompañe al bebé. También efectos sanitarios suficientes para el vuelo (pañales, toallitas, cremas y bolsas de desecho para pañales).

6.        Las mujeres podrán llevar asimismo artículos de higiene femenina (compresas, tampones, toallitas) a ser posible desempaquetados, y pañuelos de papel.

 

7.        El Departamento advierte además a los pasajeros de que todo líquido será confiscado.

8.        Se permitirán también llaves, pero no electrónicas.

9.        Toda silla de ruedas, bastón o andador tendrá que pasar por los escáneres de seguridad y los rayos X, y después del control de seguridad sólo se permitirán las sillas de ruedas del aeropuerto.

El Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores añade en su página web que "por el momento, no hay indicación alguna del tiempo durante el cual van a estar vigentes estas medidas de seguridad". 

Ud decide si viaja o no a Londres, a USA,  o Europa en General.

Saludos Rodrigo González Fernández, consultajuridica.blogspot.com

 

 

 

Thursday, August 10, 2006

TRASCENDENTAL NOTICIA PARA CHILE. TRATADO CON CHINA

Senado aprueba histórico Tratado de Libre Comercio con China

En condiciones de ser promulgada como Ley de la República quedó el proyecto de acuerdo, en segundo trámite, que aprueba el Tratado de Libre Comercio entre Chile y la República Popular China. Ello, luego que el Senado aprobara, por unanimidad, dicha iniciativa que fue calificada como “un acuerdo histórico en la política de apertura comercial y globalización de Chile”. Durante el debate intervinieron los senadores Roberto Muñoz Barra, Carlos Ominami, Sergio Romero, Hosaín Sabag, Jaime Naranjo, Jovino Novoa, Juan Antonio Coloma, Alejandro Navarro, Jaime Gazmuri, Hernán Larraín y Jorge Arancibia, además del canciller Alejandro Foxley, quienes coincidieron en la trascendencia de este nuevo TLC y a la vez, en los grandes desafíos que generará en el ámbito de las estrategias de desarrollo de nuestro país.

SALUDOS RODRIGO GONZÁLEZ FERNÁNDEZ, consultajuridica.blogspot.com

from legal watch blog

Legal Blog Watch
Marketing Advice for Firms That Want to Be Something to Everyone
Larry Bodine of  Professional Services Marketing Blog has a summer-reading recommendation for law firms: Chris Anderson's book, The Long Tail, which Bodine argues applies to law firm marketing. As Bodine writes:

[The Long Tail] proves that the day of the full-service, general practice law firm is over.  Clients don't want generalists, whom they see as jacks-of-all-trades, masters-of-none.  They want an expert in their particular problem.  This is very good news for litigation boutiques, IP firms and specialty practice firms. Clients want the needle in the haystack, the lawyer who knows how to solve their precise problems, and thanks to the Web, clients can find them. 

So what's a ginormous firm to do in a boutique world?  Bodine has this advice:

firms that market themselves as industry experts are "organizing around the market," and presenting themselves in the way clients buy. It's time to identify the firm's high-margin, most profitable practices and start blogs about them.  The prime example is Dennis Crouch's Patently-O blog, which gets 50,000 visitors per week.  The blog has brought in Fortune 500 companies and referrals from lawyers he's never met.  He makes a point about writing about client interests, not all the services the firm has to offer.

In other words, a large firm is better off presenting itself as a collection of experts rather than a conglomerate of lawyers. Is your firm taking this approach?

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on August 9, 2006 at 02:57 PM | Permalink

Do As We Say, Not As We Do ...
At this post at Crime and Federalism, Mike Cernovich introduces us to the law firm of Laquer, Urban, Clifford & Hodge, which, according to its Web site, counsels employers  "on prevention and education to avoid costly problems." As Mike notes, however, the firm apparently did not take its own advice. The firm faces a $1.1 million judgment for firing an associate who could not meet his billable requirements because of time off for treatment for chronic liver disease.

Others in the blogosphere have chimed in as well. Ted Frank at Overlawyered found entertainment in the firm's defense: that it fired the lawyer for violating the firm's vacation-leave policy by taking a trip to attend his father-in-law's memorial service. And Mike Fox at Employers' Lawyer remarks here that lawyers are typically not sympathetic plaintiffs -- unless they're suing their law firm. 

I'm sure the $1.1 million judgment isn't going to hurt the firm's bottom line (the plaintiff was willing to settle for $450,000). But I'm guessing that this kind of publicity about a firm that handles employment work will cost it far more than $1.1 million in business going forward.

Which leads to a second point. Used to be that suing your law firm for discrimination or wrongful termination was a reputation-killer in the legal community that would render a lawyer virtually unemployable. (After all, why would a risk-averse law firm hire a lawyer who was suing his or her former firm?) But as this case bears out, the Internet gives new leverage to a lawyer with a suit against a former firm. Maybe filing a lawsuit against a large firm will end a lawyer's big firm career, but what law firms must now realize is that when a wrongfully terminated lawyer files suit, he can take the firm down with him.

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on August 9, 2006 at 02:54 PM | Permalink

A Handful of Ways for Law Firms to Compete on Price
Conventional wisdom suggests that law firms should not compete on price, but I get the impression from Rees Morrison's recent posts that corporate clients might appreciate cost- saving measures. Morrison discusses one approach some firms have taken to reduce costs (albeit to increase over all revenues for the law firm): volume discounts that apply retroactively. As Morrison describes, law firms pitch the volume discount this way:

Give us more work and we will agree deeper cuts. For example, if the actual hours of  work by the firm during a year multiplied by the firm's rates amounts to $3 million plus, the firm's discount will deepen one  percent per million for any services above $2 million.

Morrison continue s:

More dramatically, firms propose retroactive rate reductions. For example, assume the same $2 million projected level of services by the law firm. If the actual work done exceeds that amount by $1 million or more, a higher discount will take effect for ALL work done during the 12 month period -- that is, the increased discount will apply retroactively to the preceding work.

Another way that firms can offer lower costs is through competitive bid programs, where law firms commit to billing rates for each level of attorney that are 5 percent lower than those proposed by the next-highest bidder. And Morrison even suggests a way that firms can make that offer without losing revenue: by funnelling work to lawyers in branch of fices in lower-cost cities, with lower billing rates.

Plenty of ideas here, but will law firms bite?

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on August 9, 2006 at 02:50 PM | Permalink

Serve Your Legal Career With Client Service
The blog world continues to focus on ways that lawyers can improve service to clients, in particular, by finding ways to instill an ethic of service within the culture of the law firm. Over at Legal Sanity, Arnie Herz references posts  by David Maister and Dick Richards that can guide firms in creating, what Richards terms, "a mythology of client service." Specifically, Richards advises firms to foster client service by:

(1) culling and sharing stories of extraordinary service from "their organization's past and present;" and (2) encouraging employees to engage in dialogue about exceptional customer service they've received.

And what's the feedback for lawyers who take this advice to heart? Plenty, suggests Michelle Golden, since service types are viewed as the real stars in law firms. Put another way, serving others will serve you well in your career.

Ron Friedmann at Prism Legal takes a different approach to improving client service with this post on Client or Mystery Shopper? Friedmann recognizes the difficulty with using "mystery clients" to test lawyers' effectiveness in delivering service, but recommends that firms use client surveys to see whether they're meeting their clients needs.

As a solo, I've always recognized the value of client service; personal experience is what we solos have long touted as our advantage over larger, less personal law firms. At the same time,  as I wrote here in the Paradox of Client Service, we can never equate service with being a "hired gun" or allowing our clients to become our masters. Foremost, if we don't retain our independent judgment, we may serve our short-term interest of keeping the client (think Vinson and Elkins and Enron!), but we harm both our client and our own reputation in the long run.

Posted by Carolyn Elefant on August 9, 2006 at 02:46 PM | Permalink

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

JURISPRUDENTIA UNA BUENA PAGINA DE DERECHO CHILENA

Ayer conocí una página Chilena  vinculafda al derecho que se llama Jurisprudentia  y que es muy buena . Desde ya los invito a visitarla y encontrarán mucho material y ordenado. Cuestión no menor ya que es muy difícil hacerlo, pero allí lo lograron. Si ustedes ven nuestros 36 blogs temáticos son el desorden mismo, pero es nuestra realidad .Ya cambiaremos.  Vean acá:
Saludos Rodrigo González Fernández, consultajuridica.blogspot.com

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

IMPORTANTES NOTICIAS DE BCN LEGISLATIVA.

Sepa de las principales actividades del Parlamento y cómo le afectarán las leyes publicadas.
Proyecto busca aplicar el criterio de agravante a las llamadas anónimas cuando se investigue el delito de amenazas.
La iniciativa modifica la ley de protección de los derechos del consumidor y establece como delito las reparaciones mal realizadas.
Iniciativa que contempla un bono pagable de una sola vez, establece que podrán recibirlo los exonerados por motivos políticos entre el 11 de septiembre de 1973 y el 29 de septiembre de 1975.
Gobierno presentó proyecto de ley que crea el examen único nacional de conocimientos de medicina para cargos en los Servicios de Salud e incorpora exigencias al Sistema de Alta Dirección Pública.
ver más

Legislación temática

Construcción
Selección de normas relevantes y relacionadas.

Decreto Nº 458
Ley General de Urbanismo y Construcciones.
(Diario Oficial de 13 de abril de 1976).

Decreto Nº 47
Ordenanza General de Urbanismo y Construcciones.
(Diario Oficial de 5 de junio de 1992).

Ley Nº 20.071
Crea y regula el Registro Nacional de Revisores Independientes de Obras de Edificación.
(Diario Oficial de 22 de noviembre de 2005).

Ley Nº 19.865
Financiamiento Urbano Compartido.
(Diario Oficial de 1 de abril de 2003).

Ley Nº 19.472
Normas relativas a la calidad de la construcción.
(Diario Oficial de 16 de septiembre de 1996).

ver más
Conozca sobre
 Cómo afecta la ley a su vida cotidiana.

Ruidos molestos domiciliarios

¿Qué se considera ruido molesto?

¿Qué normas regulan los ruidos molestos?

¿Qué son las ordenanzas municipales sobre ruidos molestos?

ver más

Fw: August 2006 Newsletter

 
----- Original Message -----
To:Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 4:01 PM
Subject: August 2006 Newsletter

August 8, 2006
New York City

rodrigo gonzalez fernandez
director, consultajuridica

Dear rodrigo:

Dog Days of Summer?  Well, not exactly:  At least not here at "Adam Smith, Esq." (although the dog is making the most of where the airconditioner's output hits the floor at the optimal angle). 

For starters, we launched the second "Reader Survey," which you should take if you haven't already:  It takes 3—5 minutes, tops, and helps me understand how to make "Adam Smith, Esq." more useful to you and more focused on your key interests.   Again, if you haven't taken it, click here to do so. 

So, without further preliminaries, to this past month's "greatest hits:"

  • My friend Professor Bill Henderson of Indiana University Law School/Bloomington published a paper available online about the characteristics and ramifications of single-tier (up-or-out, all equity partnerships) vs. two-tier (equity and non-equity, or "of counsel," etc.) partnership models.  Empirically based, Bill's paper asserts that single-tier firms are more profitable based on PPP than two-tier firms across the board, even after controlling for geographic market segment and firm leverage.  It's a counter-intuitive read, which has attracted some attention.
  • In "The War for Talent," I frame a debate about what helps you retain valued associates.  Legal Week posits that it's that familiar, but seemingly impossible-to-implement, "work/life balance," "flexibility," and recognition of "broader lifestyle aspirations" that keeps them happy—the "dove" school of thought.  Conversely, McKinsey reports that the most important contributors to career satisfaction are the "hawk" values of the firm's culture, individual autonomy, exciting challenges, opportunities for growth, and that at the very bottom of the ladder (scoring mostly in the single-digits) are "respect for lifestyle" and "acceptable pace and stress" (1%!).  Looking at your career, which is it for you?
  • In a geographic analysis of the migratory patterns, as it were, of the AmLaw 200 and the Fortune 500 over the past couple of decades, I see if there's an explanation for the correlation between the concentration of (a) corporate headquarters; (b) BigLaw lawyers; and (c) the best art, fashion, and cuisine (sorry—made that last one up).
  • "What Are Other Firms Doing?"  Wrong! looks at our penchant for benchmarking and whether our training in precedent and risk-aversion gets us in trouble when we don our C[X]O hats.
  • And lastly, I discuss reasons behind the oft-remarked divergence between a firm's "intended" strategy and its "realized" strategy, and explain what some Harvard Business School professors have to say about the lamentable phenomenon.

For our bonus, newsletter-only content, this month we feature the Big News that Freshfields decided to introduce non-equity partners into its structure.  As the ranks of single-tier, equity-only, firms shrink, surely Freshfields' bowing to the inevitable (or was it?—that's really the question, isn't it?) ranks as a headline event. 

Your assignment is, first, to take a look at this Legal Week piece discussing the perceived benefits (economic) and risks (cultural) of Freshfields' move, and then to share your thoughts about the implications through this handy-dandy "Adam Smith, Esq." poll—for newsletter readers, only. 

And if you want to know what your newsletter-reading colleagues think of Freshfields' move, that's right:  You'll have to check out next month's newsletter.

As always, I invite thoughts, comments, and observations.  

That wraps up the "Adam Smith, Esq." monthly newsletter for August 2006.

My parting wish for you all is that: (a) you share this with friends and colleagues who might find it of at least incidental interest; and (b) of far greater importance, that you let me know how I can make it sharper, more useful, more helpful.

Best regards,



If you no longer wish to receive the monthly "Adam Smith, Esq." newsletter, have you completely taken leave of your senses?! But if you insist, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe

Forward this message to a friend
Email:

This message was sent by Adam Smith, Esq. using VerticalResponse's iBuilder®
Adam Smith, Esq.
305 West 98th Street
#4C-S
New York, New York 10025

Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy.

CUBA

'Cuba: What we know for sure'
by Georgia Popplewell

Babalu Blog posts a lists of things "we know for sure" about what's going on in Cuba.

You may view the latest post at
http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2006/08/08/cuba-what-we-know-for-sure/

Monday, August 07, 2006

SALAMANCA WITH FREE WI- FI, CHILE

'Working for the First Wi-Fi City in Chile'
by Rosario Lizana

Salamanca (ES) is a city with a population of around 25,000. It is located in the fourth region, Coquimbo. The project is called “Salamanca: The first municipal XXI Century town”.  As Atina Chile (ES) explains, this is a project that involves the municipality of Salmanca (ES) , the Pelambres Copper Foundation, D-link, and organized by the Mercator Foundation (ES). The project starts in May and, according to their site, will focus on:


Free Wi Fi for the entire Municipal town
Massive digital alphabetization for the community
Give low cost access to technologic infrastructure
Create a digital Municipality
Develop a participative digital media
Campaign 1 blog per citizen
Volunteer net from all over the country to alphabetize the community


Paula Rojo (ES), from the Mercator Foundation writes:

The 60 volunteers have understood that the children and senior citizens will look at photos while connected in the main park of Salamanca; the 300 students of digital literacy;  the 200 students that are going to write on a blog, and the fact that all the authorities are working to revolutionize the city are evidence that confirm that is possible to decrease the gap that on paper cannot be removed.

You may view the latest post at
http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2006/08/07/working-for-the-first-wi-fi-city-in-chile/

Saturday, August 05, 2006

FROM LEGAL WATH NEWS

Legal Blog Watch
Of Street Fights and Blawgs
Pity the innocent bystander caught up in a street fight.

Last week, Kevin O'Keefe posted this item to his blog: Time hires Wonkette blogger: What's ALM paying Elefant and Ambrogi?, in which he referred to the writing that Carolyn Elefant and I contribute to this blog and asked, "Does ALM appreciate what they have with the two of them?"

Let me be perfectly clear: Neither Carolyn nor I solicited or knew beforehand of O'Keefe's post. When I saw it, I added a comment, tongue firmly in cheek, "A brilliant and insightful post."

The anonymous editor of Blawg Review took O'Keefe's post more seriously than did I, it appears. He/she wrote O'Keefe a private e-mail titled, "What's with Kevin O'Keefe," which O'Keefe then published under the heading, What's with Blawg Review editor? That, of course, brought a public response from the Blawg Review editor, again titled, What's with Kevin O'Keefe?

The issue, of course, is not whether ALM "appreciates" Carolyn and me. As I understand the Blawg Review editor's concern, it was that O'Keefe was out of place "to take up the causes of others without them having asked [him] to do so." Let me, again, be clear: I have no "cause" to be taken up by anyone, as far as ALM is concerned. O'Keefe has been a regular critic of ALM and other legal publishers for what he sees as their failure to "get" blogging and related technologies. In the post at issue, he singled out ALM CEO Bill Pollak, suggesting that perhaps he did not understand "the power of blogs and the need for them at ALM." In a private e-mail to O'Keefe yesterday, I wrote, "Funny thing is that Bill Pollak is one of the people at ALM who most 'gets' the Internet, blogs and all that jazz. To the extent ALM has taken leaps forward in this area, I suspect he's been a prime motivator."

At the same time, I believe every blogger should be encouraged to speak his or her mind on issues that affect the legal profession. As I also wrote privately to O'Keefe: "We need more rabble rousers, fewer ass kissers." I have no cause that needs taking up, but I am all for lawyers taking up the causes of others without necessarily awaiting an invitation.

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on August 4, 2006 at 01:06 PM | Permalink

In Law Student, Media See Citizen Kane
Not every third-year law student has $10 million in pocket change, so when 25-year-old Jared Kushner bought a majority stake in The New York Observer newspaper last week, eyebrows raised in media and legal circles alike. It was not long before some in the media saw in Kushner, a student at New York University School of Law and son of a wealthy New Jersey real estate developer currently in federal prison, echoes of Charles Foster Kane, the young newspaper publisher portrayed by Orson Welles in the 1941 film Citizen Kane.

Slate editor-at-large Jack Shafer takes the similarity a step further, drawing on Kane to offer Kushner some unsolicited advice. First, suggests Shafer, Kushner needs his Rosebud -- some reason for his interest in journalism.

"The average vanity press mogul hopes to save mankind, punish his enemies, boost his status, or revisit the remembered glories of putting out a high-school newspaper. ... If you don't have a Rosebud, get one, even if you have to make one up."

Next, says Shafer, Kushner should watch Citizen Kane a couple of times for inspiration and drop hints to others about the parallels.

"I also have a great Kane line for you to pinch. When young Kane's financial guardian asks if the muckraking he's doing with the New York Inquirer is his idea of how to run a paper, Kane retorts, 'I don't know how to run a newspaper, Mr. Thatcher. I just try everything I can think of.' There's your motto!"

Still, Shafer cautions, Kushner should not emulate Kane in all respects.

"Avoid over-eating, don't leave your wife for a bad singer, don't start a foreign war, and don't run for president."

And, of course, don't neglect to show up at law school when classes resume in the fall.

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on August 4, 2006 at 01:04 PM | Permalink

Sleuths Unearth Lost Brandeis Opinion
In the annals of First Amendment jurisprudence, the Supreme Court's 1927 opinion Whitney v. California is known for its concurrence by Justice Louis Brandeis in which he wrote an eloquent defense of free speech while joining in a decision against it. Although Brandeis' words seemed out of sync with his ruling, scholars largely overlooked this irony. Now, a recently published law review article shows that much of what Brandeis said in Whitney he had intended for his dissent in another case. When fate intervened to prevent one opinion's publication, Brandeis adapted his words to another.

The article, "Curious Concurrence: Justice Brandeis' Vote in 'Whitney v. California'," is written by Ronald K.L. Collins, First Amendment Center scholar, and David M. Skover, Seattle University law professor. Brandeis, they say, had written a striking dissent against affirming the conviction of Charles Ruthenberg, the executive secretary of the Communist Party. Before the opinion could be released, however, Ruthenberg died and his appeal was dismissed. 

"The story of the Whitney and Ruthenberg appeals is the story of the two minds of Louis Brandeis.  One case he didn't want to decide, but was forced to; the other he did want to decide, but was unable to.  One case impelled him to apologetic concurrence; the other provoked him to uninhibited dissent.  One case was to be resolved by procedural rules; the other on the merits with a new vision of the First Amendment.  All of this changed unexpectedly ... and the two minds of Louis Brandeis melded into one."

As First Amendment Center research attorney David L. Hudson Jr. writes:

"Brandeis' dissent in Ruthenberg would have become a leading light of First Amendment law instead of his Whitney concurrence were it not for Ruthenberg's untimely death from acute peritonitis in March 1927 before the release of the Court's opinion. Hence, Brandeis' dissent in Ruthenberg was withdrawn and lost to history until the Collins and Skover article, which includes the opinion in an appendix."

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on August 4, 2006 at 01:02 PM | Permalink

DA Seeks Gag on Lawyers -- but Why?
A Massachusetts district attorney wants to gag two lawyers from talking about the case of a man they helped free after 21 years in prison. In an article in this week's Boston Phoenix, writer David S. Bernstein asks why.

The lawyers, John Swormley and Harvey Silverglate, represent Bernard Baran, who was convicted in 1985 of molesting children at a day care center. In June, they won Baran's release from prison, when a judge vacated the conviction and ordered a new trial, finding that Baran's original defense was incompetent.

But now, David Capeless, the Berkshire County district attorney, has asked a judge to place a gag order on Baran's attorneys to prevent them from making public statements about the case. His argument is that discussing the case could prejudice jurors in a retrial. But author Bernstein questions that premise. He notes that Capeless, who is personally handling the Baran case, is running for re-election. He quotes another lawyer who calls the timing of the gag-order motion "odd," because Capeless is appealing the Baran ruling and "there is no pending trial whose potential jurors could be influenced."

In a recent editorial, The Berkshire Eagle portrayed this as a matter of protecting the lawyers' free speech:

"In seeking a gag order ..., Mr. Capeless argued that the defense team's comments could prejudice potential jurors. The district attorney's concerns, however, should not result in the loss of the lawyers' constitutional right to free speech. The actions of the lawyers may or may not make Mr. Capeless' job more difficult, but the search for jurors should not take precedence over a basic right enjoyed by all Americans."

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on August 4, 2006 at 12:59 PM | Permalink

Blawgging at Big Law Firms
Veteran blogger Denise Howell's recent disclosure that she had been fired from her law firm sent shockwaves through the blogosphere. Like many other commentators, I questioned what this said about the role of bloggers in larger law firms. Now, we get to hear Howell's thoughts on that question along with those of two other prominent legal bloggers who have left larger firms, Howard Bashman of How Appealing and Ernest Svenson of Ernie the Attorney.

Howell, Bashman and Svenson are our guests this week on the legal-affairs podcast Coast to Coast. We discuss, among other questions, why there aren't more legal bloggers at larger law firms, whether larger firms see value in blogging and whether bloggers by their nature tend not to fit with larger firms. You can listen to the program:

Follow future programs by subscribing to the show's RSS feed or through iTunes.

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on August 4, 2006 at 12:57 PM | Permalink

Sponsor Spotlight

Free In-House Counsel Webcast
Learn how IP experts are addressing the growing threat of online brand abuse by attending this FREE webcast: Preventing Online Brand Abuse. This one-hour presentation will surface the latest trends and best practices in establishing, maintaining and protecting corporate brands on the Internet. This on-demand event includes panelists from Best Western, TaylorMade and Verizon. View Now!

Inside Opinions: Legal Blogs
Robert Ambrogi's LawSites
Blawg Review
Adam Smith, Esq.
I/P Updates
Silicon Valley Media Blog
InhouseBlog
My Shingle
Prism Legal
Human Law
May It Please The Court
Leadership for Lawyers
Law Department Management
Insurance Scrawl
Crime & Federalism
The Wired GC
The Common Scold
Jottings by an Employer's Lawyer
Future Lawyer
The Professional Marketing Blog
From the Law.com Newswire
[about RSS]
Law.com Privacy Policy