| |
|
| |||||||||||
Rodrigo González Fernández
Consultajuridicachile.blogspot.com
Renato Sánchez 3586
telefono: 5839786
santiago-chile
Rodrigo González Fernández y un grupo de egresados de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad la Republica en Chile ha decidido poner al alcance de todo el mundo de la profesion legal importantes materias en Ingles para ir practicando el trabajo en materia de Tratados internacionales y que nuestra profesión estará en primera linea. Invitamos a todos a opinar, debatir, participar activamente.Es el primer blog legal en inglés de latinoamerica.
| |
|
| |||||||||||
| Legal Blog Watch |
Chambermaid: The Summer Must (Not?) Read
Grimmelmann calls the narrator "a raving narcissist" and offers examples of her shallowness drawn from her own words, such as this: "I was suddenly intrigued. A real-life lesbian! And she was my coclerk. I would actually have a lesbian friend! [My sister] had recently convinced me that lesbians were more fabulous than gay men." Others had kinder words for the book. At Above the Law, David Lat says he "thoroughly enjoyed" it. Legal Antics writes: "It really is hysterical! I highly recommend it." And in the New York Law Journal, reporter Thomas Adcock describes the book as "witty" and "suffused with humor." (Adcock is himself the award-winning author of several novels.) Rao, meanwhile, is doing the Q&A circuit. Earlier this month, she spoke with Peter Lattman at Law Blog, who asked her how much of the novel was based on personal experience. Her reply:
Brett McKay also interviews Rao at his blog, The Frugal Law Student. He asks her that all-important law student question, "How much debt did you incur while in law school?" Her answer:
She has yet to pay off that debt, she confides, but the second novel she is already at work on may help. Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on June 26, 2007 at 03:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) Blawg Review: Double the Hosts, Double the Fun For this week's Blawg Review #114, two bloggers team up as hosts, and the result is an almost double-length collection of citations to the week's best of the legal blogs. Double-teaming for this first Blawg Review of summer 2007 are mediator Stephanie West Allen of idealawg and mentor and lawyer coach Julie Fleming-Brown of Life at the Bar. With Julie already at the beach and Stephanie visualizing herself there, the two offer their summer summary of the sangria and watermelon of the legal blogosphere. Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on June 26, 2007 at 03:21 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) Sneak Peek: Top-ranked EDD Vendors As I noted here a year ago, the annual Socha-Gelbmann Electronic Discovery Survey could be called the Consumer Reports of EDD vendors. Based on vendor-provided data, interviews and other research, the survey ranks the top EDD companies and provides information on a number of others. The survey costs $5,000 to purchase, but an abbreviated version will be published in the August issue of Law Technology News. Today at her blog The Common Scold, LTN editor-in-chief Monica Bay has a sneak preview of the report. Among other things, she reveals the survey's 2007 picks for the top-five EDD providers. They are: Monica has other peeks at the survey, including the top-ranked providers of EDD software. Read more at her blog and watch for the article in the August LTN. Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on June 26, 2007 at 03:19 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) Cadwalader's Bed Bug Solution Bugs have been found in the New York office of white-shoe law firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. They are not of the eavesdropping kind, but of the bothersome, itch-inducing bed bug kind. At the blog Abovethelaw.com, David Lat has the memo sent yesterday to all New York staff from chairman Robert O. Link Jr. According to the memo, said bed bugs were found not in beds, but in the 33rd floor word-processing department. In a paragraph that could only -- as Lat observes -- have been written by a lawyer, Link advises:
The short-term solution: remove the box from whence said bugs emerged. And remove the person who brought the box. There was a guilty party, the memo suggests, who brought the bed bugs into the firm. That person, Link adds, "is no longer associated with the firm." Link goes on -- again sounding every bit the lawyer:
He later concludes:
So there you have it: short- and long-term strategic planning and solutions, application of the best-evidence rule, and careful ongoing investigation -- all in a day's work for a major law firm responding to a bed bug crisis. Meanwhile, Cadwalader's fruit flies and gnats are resting easy. Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on June 26, 2007 at 03:15 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| Legal Blog Watch |
How Congress Is Kept Offline Politicians have fallen in love with the Web. Political candidates use blogs, videos and social-networking tools to win votes and fill coffers. But for candidates elected to Congress, their victory means they must curtail their use of cutting-edge technologies. In an op-ed yesterday in The Hill, "Modern World, Ancient Websites," David All and Paul Blumenthal discuss how congressional franking rules restrict members of Congress in their official Web sites.
The authors, both bloggers, note that the franking rules were created decades ago to restrict the use of snail mail at taxpayer expense. Last updated in 1996, the rules prohibit use of outside Web services and ban links to personal or political Web sites. The harm in this is to the public, the authors say, blocking the free flow of information to constituents and others. They call on Congress to convene a bipartisan task force to review this situation. "The time has come," they write, "to re-imagine the world of the wired elected official." Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on June 20, 2007 at 03:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) Our Judicial Imperialism Imperialism is a word that suggests power fitting of an empire or of an emperor. An op-ed out of Australia today uses the phrase "judicial imperialism" to describe the U.S. legal system's increasing extension of its power overseas. The term might also have fit a story earlier this week out of Washington describing the increasingly imperial stance being taken by some judges towards the news media. In the opinion piece from The Sydney Morning Herald, Lawyers Without Borders is Justice American-Style, Mark Coultan, the newspaper's New York correspondent, describes how the United States is giving new meaning to the phrase, "long arm of the law." There is Hew Griffiths, the Australian forcibly extradited to a Virginia prison last month even though he never committed a crime on U.S. soil; he is charged with helping to crack copy-protected software and media products and distribute them for free. There are three British bankers -- the so-called Natwest Three -- extradited to the United States for allegedly taking part in a scheme involving former Enron executive Andrew Fastow to acquire ownership of a Cayman Islands investment company at far below worth. "If there was a crime," Coultan writes, "it was committed against a British company, in Britain by British citizens." After citing other examples, he concludes:
In Washington, meanwhile, Legal Times correspondent Tony Mauro writes about the increasing number of libel cases brought by judges. He sets the stage:
Last week, the news media began to push back, Mauro reports, "questioning when and whether judges should be able to use their own court systems as a tool to retaliate against the media." One leader in that pushback is media lawyer Bruce Sanford, a partner with Baker & Hostetler in D.C. He tells Mauro: "If these suits lead the public to feel that judges are taking care of their own, it will only add to cynicism about the judicial process." No question, judges sometimes find themselves stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to the news media. But even Gary Hengstler, director of the Reynolds National Center for Courts and the Media at the National Judicial College, tells Mauro that judges nowadays "are more emboldened to sue." In some cases, it seems to me, this attitude begins to approach imperiousness. Judges themselves differ widely in their dealings with and attitudes towards the news media. But I say Justice Scalia got it right. Becoming a judge opens you to criticism; it does not raise you above it. Judges need to understand that going in. Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi on June 20, 2007 at 03:12 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) A Blawger, a Priest and a Rabbi ... This is no laughing matter. In fact, it is getting darned right serious. At her blog Legal Antics, New York lawyer Nicole L. Black is running a competition to name the funniest law blog. Why? Well, it seems we have our own Carolyn Elefant to blame ... er, thank. Last week right here at Legal Blog Watch, she suggested that other bloggers follow the lead of Jamie Spencer at Austin Criminal Defense Law Blog and poll readers on the best blogs in a given field. (Last November, I had a similar poll on top law blogs at my LawSites blog.) The same day, Black picked up on Elefant's idea and announced her funniest blawg poll. As of today, it is down to 10 finalists, with polling set to close June 25 at 10 p.m. Eastern. Still in the running for yuk-iest law blog are Above the Law, Anonymous Lawyer, Buffalo Wings and Vodka, Legal Antics, Legal Reader, Lowering the Bar, Overlawyered, PhilaLawyer, Quizlaw and Say What? As the deadline nears, the competition heats up. At Above the Law, Billy Merck says he didn't care about it at first, but now urges readers to cast their votes because "we're getting jacked around" (pointing a finger at PhilaLawyer). And Quizlaw, amid rumors of voter fraud and ballot stuffing, says shenanigans have officially been declared. Quizlaw effectively challenged PhilaLawyer to a blogging duel when it expressed surprise at the site's standing, "considering that its 723 votes are probably more than the number of readers the blog actually has, coupled with the fact that I hadn't even heard of the site before this poll." If you're wondering what's at stake to drive otherwise upstanding blawgers to such lengths, this is not merely about crowing rights. The winner gets his or her choice of any item from The Billable Hour. |
A la calle con el Departamento de Asesoría Jurídica
Posted: 16 Jun 2007 09:26 AM CDT
¿Cuántas "takedown notices", cuantos "cease and desist" tienen que demostrar su ineficacia como para que las empresas se den cuenta de que no deben hacer caso a sus trasnochados Departamentos de Asesoría Jurídica mientras éstos no se reciclen y aprendan un poco de "la ley de la red"? En esta ocasión, la víctima vuelve a ser Dell, una empresa que ya las ha tenido de todos los colores en la red y que gracias a ello hizo sus deberes de manera muy satisfactoria, la que cae en la trampa de tener un Departamento de Asesoría Jurídica con el gatillo demasiado rápido: envían una takedown notice a The Consumerist, un sitio de altísima popularidad, porque había publicado una entrada en la que un antiguo director de uno de esos pequeños quioscos de venta que la marca tiene en galerías comerciales en Estado Unidos contaba sus "22 Confessions Of A Former Dell Sales Manager", veintidós "secretos" que van desde el puro sentido común hasta revelaciones sobre políticas de precios y descuentos, consejos sobre si pagar o no las garantías extendidas, etc. cuya revelación la marca opinaba que iba en contra de sus intereses.
Nos hallamos, una vez más, ante la paradoja de la discusión moral. Podemos pasarnos horas discutiendo si la entrada constituye o no un delito de revelación de secretos, sobre si debe o no ser objeto de denuncia o constituye en modo alguno un acto punible pero sería completamente irrelevante. Lo único que importa es que, por el hecho de haber enviado la takedown notice, publicada automáticamente por The Consumerist según hicieron clic en el mensaje, la entrada tiene ahora más de ciento y pico mil lecturas, está en la portada de Digg, y ha aparecido incluso en Dell IdeaStorm, el sitio que Dell tiene para que sus clientes hagan y voten sugerencias para la marca. Impresionante "éxito de crítica y público" que debería ser celebrado con la ejecución en la plaza pública de Tracy Holland, la persona del Departamento de Asesoría Jurídica que tuvo la obviamente estúpida idea de enviar la takedown notice. En una empresa como Dell, que asimiló de manera rapidísima las lecciones de su Dell Hell desarrollando sus propios blogs y filtros sociales, que controla sus watchlists, que se comunica con los bloggers de manera directa, el pecado de un Departamento de Asesoría Jurídica anquilosado en las prácticas tradicionales del siglo pasado resulta si cabe todavía más sangrante.
Resulta también muy interesante pensar sobre las posibles alternativas de actuación. Una cosa así, un episodio en el que un "disgruntled employee" revela información sobre una compañía, es algo que ha pasado muchas veces antes y después de existir Internet, y que sin duda pasará muchas más. ¿Cómo debe una compañía reaccionar en esos casos? ¿No dando importancia a dicha filtración, así sea en un medio tan seguido como The Consumerist? Francamente, no resulta fácil saberlo. Lo que sí está claro es que una takedown notice coloca a la compañía en la peor de las situaciones posibles: con la información supuestamente considerada crítica habiendo alcanzado una visibilidad infinitamente mayor, y con escasas posibilidades de obtener una reparación del daño producido. Y era algo, además, completamente previsible por cualquiera con un mínimo de cultura de Internet, algo que se debería suponer en el caso de Tracy Holland, firmante de la takedown notice, y que resulta ser coautora de una publicación titulada "The Corporate Response To Discovery: Surviving Litigation and Discovery in an Electronic Age" (2005). Desconozco en qué estaba pensando cuando envió el mensaje. Lo que sí sé es que, en términos de reputación e imagen, me temo que ha hecho un muy flaco favor a la compañía que paga su salario
cease and desist, Consumerist, Dell, Dell Hell, Dell IdeaStorm, Digg, legal affairs, legal counseling, legal department, takedown notice| Trade Agreements |
|---|
| Free Trade Agreements China Association Agreements UE Complementation Agreements |
| Articles and Links from Knowledge@Wharton Sponsors | ||
| GE Commercial Finance: Wharton Executive Education: Supernova 2007 Conference | ||
Sponsorship Inquiries
Visit our media kit to find out about opportunities to sponsor Knowledge@Wharton special reports, newsletters, and our site.
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/media/
Write
Knowledge@Wharton
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
3620 Locust Walk - Suite 202
Philadelphia, PA 19104