TU NO ESTAS SOLO EN ESTE MUNDO. YOU ARE NOT ALONE SI TE HA GUSTADO UN ARTICULO, COMPARTELO

Sunday, January 15, 2006

When Gerry speaks, he reaches parts of your mind that have never been used before."

Fun in a law firm? You bet!

1134739595810.jpg

Managing Partners — start thinking of ways to harness this little philosophical gem in your firm:

Fun is not a distraction from work or a drain on our revenue; it is the very source of both our inspiration and our value. A genuine sense of play ignites our creativity, eases communication, promotes goodwill and engenders loyalty, yet we tend to shun it as detrimental to the seriousness with which we think we need to approach our businesses and careers.

Extracted from a wonderful recent post in influxinsights - I encourage you to read it in its entirety.

Posted In Law Firm Leadership , The Legal Profession

 

Sincerely yours, Rodrigo González Fernández consultajuridica.blogspot.com, Santiago Chile

 

LAWYER BLOG BY Kevin O'Keefe

Este es un articulo muy interesante par alas personas del mundo del Derecho y por ello no lo traduzco para un mejor entender. Comentemos al respecto

 

Advantages of lawyer blogs

Early stage companies better with blogs than traditional PR

Shel Israel, co-author of Naked Conversations : How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers, has an excellent post on the merits of new companies using blogs and not traditional PR for early marketing and communications efforts.

...I have now become convinced that if you are a Web 2.0 early stage company, you are better off going with blogging and NOT using a PR agency until you are further along in your development. I say this without glee, because I spent 25 years doing PR for startups, and remain proud of the work I did for companies in early phases.

But times have changed, and so must PR firms in my opinion, if they are to survive.

I know that I will get in trouble for saying this, but since the early days of Naked Conversations, when I was interviewing founders of ICQ, and FireFox as well as managers at Skype, I have begun to question whether traditional Command and Control PR is a benefit.  In recent months, looking at the successes of Riya, TechCrunch, PodTech, Flock and an increasing number of Web 2.0 companies, I have become convinced that having a PR agency at launch is not only unnecessary, it can be a mistake


Shel's bulleted points are compelling.

  • Traditional PR will tell you to keep in stealth mode, then get the word out at an imaginary moment which is the technical launch.  The blogging strategist will tell you to get pieces of your story out early and often and to ask people who care about what you're doing to to help you make it better.
  • Traditional PR tries to control message, to get a company to speak with one voice.  Blogging strategy argues that it is more credible and more human to speak with many voices.  These voices may be in harmony, but a little discordance just makes your story all the more interesting.
  • Traditional PR pushes messages through media to reach customers, considering both to be 'targets.' Bloggers have ongoing two-way conversations.  The company talks, but customers talk back.  It's out in the open
  • PR programs cost a great deal of money, usually North of $10 k a month for at least six months to be effective.  Blogging costs a great deal of time, but almost no money. What you save by blogging can be put into R&D, or customer support r investor's pockets.
  • PR spends a great deal of effort pro-actively pursuing press. They get others to say you are great by writing up case studies about a few customers, then pitching them to the media or splicing them onto websites. Bloggers assume the best editors will find what customers say about you in the blogosphere by using search engines. 
  • No advertisement, PR campaign or PR pitch can possibly come close to the impact blogging as on search engines. I would argue that a new company with disruptive technology will get more ink, faster, with less effort and money through blogging, than through a PR campaign.
  • Traditional PR's philosophy is top-down.  They determine the biggest and most influential in your category, then they target them.  Blogging assumes that good news distributed at the grassroots level will emerge very quickly. 

I agree with Shel that traditional PR is not dead. But there is simply no way LexBlog would be the leading name in turnkey blog solutions for the legal profession had it gone the PR route, assuming we could afford it, which we could not. This blog has put us on the map and is the lifeblood in getting us new work.

By Kevin O'Keefe, one of the best blogs , sincerely tours, Rodrigo González Fernández

 

 

LAWYER BLOG BY Kevin O'Keefe

Advantages of lawyer blogs

Early stage companies better with blogs than traditional PR

Shel Israel, co-author of Naked Conversations : How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers, has an excellent post on the merits of new companies using blogs and not traditional PR for early marketing and communications efforts.

...I have now become convinced that if you are a Web 2.0 early stage company, you are better off going with blogging and NOT using a PR agency until you are further along in your development. I say this without glee, because I spent 25 years doing PR for startups, and remain proud of the work I did for companies in early phases.

But times have changed, and so must PR firms in my opinion, if they are to survive.

I know that I will get in trouble for saying this, but since the early days of Naked Conversations, when I was interviewing founders of ICQ, and FireFox as well as managers at Skype, I have begun to question whether traditional Command and Control PR is a benefit.  In recent months, looking at the successes of Riya, TechCrunch, PodTech, Flock and an increasing number of Web 2.0 companies, I have become convinced that having a PR agency at launch is not only unnecessary, it can be a mistake


Shel's bulleted points are compelling.

  • Traditional PR will tell you to keep in stealth mode, then get the word out at an imaginary moment which is the technical launch.  The blogging strategist will tell you to get pieces of your story out early and often and to ask people who care about what you're doing to to help you make it better.
  • Traditional PR tries to control message, to get a company to speak with one voice.  Blogging strategy argues that it is more credible and more human to speak with many voices.  These voices may be in harmony, but a little discordance just makes your story all the more interesting.
  • Traditional PR pushes messages through media to reach customers, considering both to be 'targets.' Bloggers have ongoing two-way conversations.  The company talks, but customers talk back.  It's out in the open
  • PR programs cost a great deal of money, usually North of $10 k a month for at least six months to be effective.  Blogging costs a great deal of time, but almost no money. What you save by blogging can be put into R&D, or customer support r investor's pockets.
  • PR spends a great deal of effort pro-actively pursuing press. They get others to say you are great by writing up case studies about a few customers, then pitching them to the media or splicing them onto websites. Bloggers assume the best editors will find what customers say about you in the blogosphere by using search engines. 
  • No advertisement, PR campaign or PR pitch can possibly come close to the impact blogging as on search engines. I would argue that a new company with disruptive technology will get more ink, faster, with less effort and money through blogging, than through a PR campaign.
  • Traditional PR's philosophy is top-down.  They determine the biggest and most influential in your category, then they target them.  Blogging assumes that good news distributed at the grassroots level will emerge very quickly. 

I agree with Shel that traditional PR is not dead. But there is simply no way LexBlog would be the leading name in turnkey blog solutions for the legal profession had it gone the PR route, assuming we could afford it, which we could not. This blog has put us on the map and is the lifeblood in getting us new work.

By Kevin O'Keefe, one of the best blogs , sincerely tours, Rodrigo González Fernández

 

 

Law blog launch : Silicon Valley Media Law blog

Katherine Kirkman, of the nationwide law firm of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, has launched the Silicon Valley Media Law Blog. Cathy's blog will be a trusted and reliable source of legal updates, news and insight on digital media, copyright and Internet law for industry executives, in-house counsel and referring counsel.

Cathy, working out the Palo Alto California office, regularly advises clients on new business models, content rights issues, copyright and DMCA issues, online contracts, privacy, spam, spyware, as well as patent and technology licensing issues relating to digital rights management and compression standards.

Cathy contacted LexBlog because she wanted to market her legal services by way of sharing her intellectual capital in an upbeat and tasteful manner. She also new that her existing and prospective clients expected to see her use the latest in marketing technology as means of convenience for them.

It's an honor for LexBlog to have Cathy on board as a client. We strive to serve the nation's leading lawyers. Just a quick look at some of Cathy's clients tells you she is a real leader, and frankly it's a little humbling.

For more info:

http://kevin.lexblog.com/blog-sites-by-lexblog-823-law-blog-launch-silicon-valley-media-law-blog.html

Sincerely yours, Rodrigo González Fernández, lawyerschile.blogspot.com, consultajuridica.blogspot.com

TODO ESTA EN LIQUIDACION EN LA SOCIEDAD CHILENA

¿QUE PASA EN NUESTRA SOCIEDAD = TODO EN LIQUIDACION?

Enero es el mes de las rebajas en Chile y al parecer en el mundo. Se liquida  en los comercios de todo el país y los buscadores de gangas y de oportunidades andan de cacería, pero la que parece estar realmente de oferta, bajando cada día más su precio y su aprecio, es la democracia chilena ,  que retrocede en todos los frentes igual que en España y  ya lo señaló Rubiales en Europa y pensamos con él  en Chile .

Bajan la cohesión de la sociedad, la unidad nacional, las libertades y derechos ciudadanos, la libertad de expresión, la seguridad ciudadana, la capacidad de alcanzar consenso y la voluntad de convivir en armonía, la información ciudadana , la transparencia ,esencia de la nación chilena , que se encuentra a precio de  super saldo ,más aún ,terminando las campañas políticas. Lo ha dicho bien Franky en” voto en blanco” uno de los mejores blogs en Europa.

Bajan , el aprecio ciudadano por la política, el respeto a los políticos y el prestigio del sistema, al igual que la unión entre los ciudadanos y su gobierno.

Pero los ciudadanos creen más bien que los culpables de que la nación y la convivencia estén a precio de saldo son los políticos y sus partidos, los cuales, demostrando irresponsabilidad, ineficacia e incapacidad para cooperar en la búsqueda del bien común, han relegado el interés general y se han dedicado a la trifulca y al enfrentamiento a ultranza.

También están  a precio de liquidación  los valores y los principios democráticos, la credibilidad de los medios de comunicación, la importancia de la ciudadanía y la confianza de los ciudadanos en sus instituciones.
¿Qué está pasando en esta sociedad? Mientras tanto,  el Presidente Ricardo Lagos – según encuestas llega a una adhesión de  cerca 75% la más alta en la historia de Chile.
Saludos Rodrigo González Fernández, vean la realidad Española en Voto en Blanco

 

Un cliente nos consulta  lo difícil que le ha resultado  llegar a entablar una relación profesional con una Universidad en Santiago, Chile, en busca de  investigación & desarrollo

DESENCUENTROS ENTRE LA UNIVERSIDAD Y LA EMPRESA
Son dos mundos que se buscan pero no se encuentran. La relación entre las universidades CHILENAS  y las empresas es escasa y, en la mayoría de los casos, inconexa. Aunque ambas reconocen la importancia vital de trabajar unidas, en muchas ocasiones no lo consiguen, Wahrton se ha preocupado

 Un perfil demasiado academicista frente al pragmatismo empresarial y un desconocimiento de las posibilidades que ofrecen los centros universitarios son los principales puntos de fricción que impiden un trato más estrecho entre estos dos motores económicos del país. Pero hay otro punto de fricción cual es que en las Universidades Chilenas  - con algunas excepciones – no se enseña a ser empresario. ¿O es que el empresario nace y no se forma? En mi opinión los empresarios del futuro se forman, independientemente de las condiciones de cada cual.

¿Han pensado acaso las Universidades en  la formación de abogados  para la empresa o han pensado los abogados como empresarios por citar una profesión?

Discutamos esta situación. Invito a las Universidades Chilenas a contribuir con aportes.

Saludos Rodrigo González Fernández, consultajuridica.blogspot.com

IMPORTANTE PARA ABOGADOS CONOCER QUE PASA EN STANFORD USA.

IN THIS ISSUE:LAW @ STANFORD

NEWS

  • Dean Larry Kramer Announces New Law School Academic Calendar
  • "Securities Firms See a Decline In Investor Suits, Loss Claims"
  • "So, Guy Walks Up to the Bar, and Scalia Says"
  • "An Ideological Rumble"
  • "Will Execution Move the Debate?"
  • "Justices Ponder Heavy Patent Docket"
  • "Human Brain Cells Are Grown in Mice"
  • "Wal-Mart Workers Win Suit"

FACULTY ON THE RECORD

  • Goldstein; Grundfest; Karlan; Lessig; Rhode; Sullivan

UPCOMING CAMPUS EVENTS

  • Conferences; lectures; symposia; and more

UPCOMING REGIONAL EVENTS

  • Los Angeles; New York; San Diego; Silicon Valley

NEWS

"DEAN LARRY KRAMER ANNOUNCES NEW LAW SCHOOL ACADEMIC CALENDAR"
Dean Larry Kramer issued a statement announcing the transition of the law school academic calendar to the quarter system. The change in the schedule will make it more compatible with the university's other schools and departments, affording students more opportunities to pursue joint degrees and innovative research, while allowing the school to create unique interdisciplinary courses and programs. The move will take place in two steps, allowing any issues, logistical and other, to be resolved with minimal confusion and cost. Beginning next year the law school will adopt a modified semester approach, making the full transition to the quarter system in the academic year 2009-2010.

"SECURITIES FIRMS SEE A DECLINE IN INVESTOR SUITS, LOSS CLAIMS"
"Wall Street Journal" article quotes
Professor Joseph Grundfest about a new study from the Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse and Cornerstone Research.

"SO, GUY WALKS UP TO THE BAR, AND SCALIA SAYS"
"New York Times" story quotes
Professor Pamela Karlan and Lecturer Thomas Goldstein about laughter during Supreme Court arguments.

"AN IDEOLOGICAL RUMBLE"
"San Francisco Chronicle" front-page article quotes
Professor Deborah L. Rhode, director of the Stanford Center on Ethics, on the role Roe v. Wade may play during Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito's confirmation hearings.

"WILL EXECUTION MOVE THE DEBATE?"
"Chicago Tribune" coverage quotes
Professor Lawrence Marshall on the execution of Stanley "Tookie" Williams in California, and whether public outcry will fuel long-term protest against the death penalty.

"JUSTICES PONDER HEAVY PATENT DOCKET"
"National Law Journal" article on the quantity of upcoming patent cases in the Supreme Court quotes from
Professor and former Dean Kathleen M. Sullivan's argument before the High Court in Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink.

"HUMAN BRAIN CELLS ARE GROWN IN MICE"
"Washington Post" coverage quotes
Professor Hank Greely on current research involving the successful injection of human embryonic stem cells into the brains of fetal mice.

"WAL-MART WORKERS WIN SUIT"
"Los Angeles Times" front-page article quotes
Professor Deborah Hensler on the size of the award to Wal-Mart workers in a suit involving wages and hours.

FACULTY ON THE RECORD

GOLDSTEIN: "NEW PAPERS RELEASED ON SUPREME COURT NOMINEE ALITO"
NPR's "Morning Edition" coverage includes commentary by
Lecturer Thomas Goldstein.

KARLAN: "NEW PAPERS REINFORCE ALITO'S JUDICIAL CONSERVATISM"
NPR's "All Things Considered" features commentary by
Professor Pamela Karlan.

LESSIG: "WHEN THEFT SERVES ART"
"Wired" column by
Professor Lawrence Lessig, director of the Center for Internet and Society, comments on the unique licensing practices of the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts.

LESSIG: "CREATIVES FACE A CLOSED NET"
"Financial Times" Op-Ed by
Professor Lawrence Lessig, director of the Center for Internet and Society, discusses the necessity of "Read-Write," instead of "Read-Only," internet technology.

RHODE: "GIVING TILL IT HURTS"
"American Lawyer" column by
Professor Deborah L. Rhode, director of the Stanford Center on Ethics, analyzes legal ethics issues in a question-and-answer format. In this issue, Rhode answers questions on pro bono work and the ethics of case selection.

SULLIVAN: "THE ALITO HEARINGS"
"NewsHour with Jim Lehrer" features commentary by
Professor and former Dean Kathleen M. Sullivan on the first day of the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito.

SULLIVAN: "JUSTICE IN THE BALANCE"
"Washington Post" book review by
Professor and former Dean Kathleen M. Sullivan on Joan Biskupic's biography of Sandra Day O'Connor '52.

UPCOMING CAMPUS EVENTS

"BEYOND THE EMBRYO"
Friday, January 20, 2006, 1:00 to 6:00 p.m., Lucille Packard Children's Hospital Auditorium, Stanford University Medical Center.
The Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Program on Stem Cells and Society will host this symposium on issues in stem cell research. Professor Hank Greely will give a lecture entitled, "Stem Cells and Chimeras: Issues real and chimerical." For more information, contact Joyce Prasad at jprasad@stanford.edu.

ACS PRESENTS: SENATOR MAX CLELAND
Wednesday February 1, 2006, 6:00 to 7:00 p.m., Room 290, Stanford Law School. Former Senator Max Cleland will speak on national security and the war in Iraq. Sponsored by the American Constitution Society. For more information, contact Rhett Millsaps at
rhettm@stanford.edu.

WILSEY DISTINGUISHED LECTURER: RICHARD WEST
Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 5:30 p.m., Annenberg Auditorium, Cummings Art Building, Stanford University. Law school alumnus Richard West '71, director of the National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian Institution, is the 2006 Wilsey Distinguished Lecturer. The subject of the presentation is the "National Museum of the American Indian: Journeys in a Post-Colonial World." Sponsored by Cantor Arts Center. For more information, contact Kristen Olson at
klolson@stanford.edu.

"MOBSTERS, UNIONS, AND FEDS: ORGANIZED CRIME AND ORGANIZED LABOR"
Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 5:00 to 7:00 p.m., Stanford Law School. James Jacobs, NYU professor of criminal law and criminal justice and director of the Center for Research in Crime and Justice, will speak about organized crime and organized labor. Sponsored by the Stanford Criminal Justice Center. For more information, contact Kara Dansky at
kdansky@stanford.edu.

"SPIES, SECRETS, & SECURITY: THE NEW LAW OF INTELLIGENCE"
Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 12:30 to 7:00 p.m., Stanford Law School.
Sponsored by the Stanford Law & Policy Review, Stanford National Security Law Society, and the Center for Internet and Society. This one-day symposium will analyze the law and policy of intelligence and national security. The Honorable Patricia Wald, of the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD Commission), will be the featured speaker. Alumni admission is free with RSVP. For more information, contact Joe Ross at joeross@stanford.edu.

SPILF'S ANNUAL "BID FOR JUSTICE AUCTION"
Saturday, March 4, 2006, 6:00 p.m. silent auction, 8:00 p.m. live auction, Crown Quadrangle (silent auction) and Kresge Auditorium (live auction), Stanford Law School. The Stanford Public Interest Law Foundation (SPILF) auction enables the organization to provide stipends for students who volunteer at public interest jobs during the summer, and award grants to nonprofit organizations engaged in public interest projects. For more information contact this year's co-chairs of the event, Melissa Magner, mmagner@stanford.edu, and Pete Schermerhorn,
pscherme@stanford.edu.

"THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN CRIMINAL CASES: A NATIONAL CRISIS"
Monday, March 6, 2006, 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., Stanford Law School.
Sponsored by the Stanford Criminal Justice Center, this event will present the findings of the National Committee on the Right to Counsel, explore their implications for the practice of law, and discuss possible solutions to the problems the data present. The event is open to all alumni, and registration is required. For more information, contact Kara Dansky at kdansky@stanford.edu.

STANFORD CONFERENCE ON NEUROSCIENCE AND LIE DETECTION
Friday, March 10, 2006, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Stanford Law School. Sponsored by the Center for Law and the Biosciences, this conference will explore the impact of neuroscience's advances in the ability to monitor the operations of the brain, and the application of these advances to enhance the efficacy of lie detection. The morning session of the conference will examine the scientific plausibility of reliable lie detection through neuroscientific methods, discussing different methods and assessing their likely success. The afternoon session will assume that at least one of those methods is established as reliable and will then explore what social and legal ramifications will follow. For more information, contact Trish Gertridge at
tgertridge@law.stanford.edu.

"CULTURAL ENVIRONMENTALISM AT 10"
Friday and Saturday, March 11 and 12, 2006, 1:00 to 5:15 p.m. and 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Room 180, Stanford Law School. Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society will host a symposium to explore the development and expansion of the metaphor of "cultural environmentalism" over the course of ten busy years for intellectual property law. Four scholars will present original papers on the topic, and a dozen intellectual property experts will comment and expand on their works. Please visit the CIS website to
register. For more information, contact Lauren Gelman at gelman@stanford.edu.

"LOOKING BACKWARD, LOOKING FORWARD: THE LEGACY OF CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST AND JUSTICE O'CONNOR"
Friday and Saturday, March 17 and 18, 2006, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., Stanford Law School. The 2006 Stanford Law Review symposium will explore the ways in which Justices O'Connor and Rehnquist left their marks on the Supreme Court, and how the High Court may evolve in the coming years. The symposium will include panels on Federalism, the Fourteenth Amendment, economic interests and personal liberties, and judicial philosophy. For more information, contact Michelle Skinner at
mskinner@stanford.edu.

UPCOMING REGIONAL EVENTS

LOS ANGELES: STANFORD DAY IN LOS ANGELES
Saturday, January 21, 2006, 1:00 to 7:30 p.m., The Millennium Biltmore Hotel, 506 S. Grand Ave., Los Angeles. Featuring "The Rehnquist Court and Beyond: What's Next for the Supreme Court and the Constitution?" a faculty seminar by Norman Spaulding, professor of law and John A. Wilson Distinguished Faculty Scholar, Stanford Law School. Co-sponsored by SAA. Please visit the event's website to register. For more information, contact the Stanford Law School Office of Alumni Relations at
alumni.relations@law.stanford.edu.

SILICON VALLEY: "THE FINISHING SCHOOL"
Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 6:00 p.m., Faculty Lounge, Stanford Law School.
Michele Martinez '89 will discuss her new novel, "The Finishing School," her second about the character Melanie Vargas, a New York City federal prosecutor. For more information or to RSVP, contact the Stanford Law School Office of Alumni Relations at alumni.relations@law.stanford.edu.

LOS ANGELES: "THE FINISHING SCHOOL"
Friday, January 27, 2006, 7:00 p.m., The Mystery Bookstore, 1036-C Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles. Michele Martinez '89 will discuss her new novel, "The Finishing School," her second about the character Melanie Vargas, a New York City federal prosecutor. For more information or to RSVP, contact the Stanford Law School Office of Alumni Relations at
alumni.relations@law.stanford.edu.

SILICON VALLEY: THE ACTORS' GANG, "THE EXONERATED"
Friday, February 10, 2006; 7:00 p.m. pre-show discussion, 8:00 p.m. performance; Stanford Law School (discussion) and Dinkelspiel Auditorium, Stanford University (performance). Featuring a pre-show discussion with Larry Marshall, professor of law, David and Stephanie Mills Director of Clinical Education, and associate dean for public interest and clinical education. RSVP and ticket price information forthcoming via email. For more information, contact the Stanford Law School Office of Alumni Relations at
alumni.relations@law.stanford.edu.

SAN DIEGO: "MAY IT AMUSE THE COURT"
Wednesday, March 1, 2006, time and location to be announced, please save the date. Join in this special opportunity to discuss Michael A. Kahn's JD/MA '73 recently published collection of editorial cartoons, "May it Amuse the Court: Editorial Cartoons of the Supreme Court and Constitution," with topics ranging from secession to the 2000 presidential election. Mr. Kahn, who has published more than ten articles regarding the Supreme Court, will also engage the audience in a timely review of the characters and controversies depicted in today's editorial cartoons. For more information, contact the Stanford Law School Office of Alumni Relations at
alumni.relations@law.stanford.edu.

NEW YORK: "THE FINISHING SCHOOL"
Tuesday, March 21, 2006, time and location to be announced, please save the date. Michele Martinez '89 will discuss her new novel, "The Finishing School," her second about the character Melanie Vargas, a New York City federal prosecutor. For more information, contact the Stanford Law School Office of Alumni Relations at
alumni.relations@law.stanford.edu.


MAKE A GIFT TO STANFORD LAW SCHOOL ONLINE
You may make a gift online or by calling 650/736-1238.

Law@Stanford is prepared by Stanford Law School Communications.

 

 

ThumbnailElecciones en Chile: Bachelet roza el triunfo con la desigualdad social como foco del debate
A los ojos del mundo la economía de Chile es ejemplar y los analistas suelen hablar del modelo chileno cuando se refieren a la gestión macroeconómica de los gobiernos de la Concertación por la Democracia, la coalición de centro-izquierda que ha detentado el poder durante los últimos quince años. Sin embargo, ese activo envidiable no logra ocultar una pesada carga: Chile exhibe una distribución del ingreso considerada de las peores en América Latina. Esa desigualdad social ha sido uno de los elementos centrales de las elecciones presidenciales y parlamentarias que el último domingo 11 dejaron como ganadora parcial a la socialista Michelle Bachelet. La abanderada de la Concertación obtuvo el 45,95% de los votos, cifra insuficiente para alcanzar inmediatamente la Presidencia. Su adversario en la segunda vuelta –que tendrá lugar el 15 de enero- será el acaudalado empresario Sebastián Piñera, representante de la derecha moderada y más cercana al centro político, que logró el 25,41% de los votos. Ambas candidaturas coinciden en un aspecto: el modelo chileno de economía de mercado y la apertura comercial no están en juego.

Como ven en Wharton, se han preocupado de la elección Chilena.

Saludos Rodrigo González Fernández